Kibwami, N and Tutesigensi, A (2014) Using the literature based discovery research method in a context of built environment research. In: Raiden, A and Aboagye-Nimo, E (eds.) Proceedings of 30th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2014, Portsmouth, UK.
Abstract
For two disparate research groups, unaware of each other's work, one group can inadvertently solve a problem prevalent in the other. Without considering work from both groups together, such breakthroughs may remain undiscovered. The solution is literature based discovery (LBD), a method which involves investigation or search for novel hypotheses connecting work from two or more disparate contexts. However, LBD has predominantly been used to address medical problems, and its uptake outside medical research remains scanty. In the context of built environment research, there are countable studies that have claimed using LBD and moreover, they presented sparse details. On one hand, studies that have claimed using LBD as a research method seem to confuse it with traditional literature reviews, and on the other hand, even those that could have used LBD seem unaware that they used some kind of LBD-style analysis. Following the original principles of LBD, this paper presents an LBD-inspired research method and a demonstration of its applicability within a built environment research context. The findings indicate promising leads to encouraging LBD and elucidating several misconceptions surrounding its use in built environment research. It is hoped that this paper will encourage future research in built environment, like construction management research, to confidently use LBD appropriately and consciously.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; carbon emissions; literature based discovery |
| Index terms: | built environment, carbon emission, management research, investigation, literature review, built environment research |
| Subjects: | climate science, infrastructure and transport systems, research design and methodology, research management, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Research Practice, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 CA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here