Robertson, C M (2014) The role of crowd-sourced energy performance feedback in low-energy building design and management in the context of industry pressures. PhD thesis, University College London, UK.
Abstract
The European Performance of Buildings Directive and the United Kingdom Climate Change Act have resulted in a range of measures aimed at lowering building energy consumption. This framework uses regulatory, market based and other levers to encourage reductions in consumption and associated carbon emissions. Parallel to this is a set of drivers generated by social, economic and broader professional responsibilities. These include reputational pressures, personal and organisation ambitions, economic risks and societal pressures. This study used a mixed methodology to define this combination of influences as the ‘contextual pressures’. An initial literature review was combined with a phase of empirical research through participant observation in the early stage development of the CarbonBuzz platform to add practitioner insight to the framework. The role that energy information feedback currently plays in design, construction and management practice was then investigated. Three data collection and analysis phases were carried out: an industry-wide web-based survey; secondary energy consumption data from the CarbonBuzz platform and semi-structured interviews aimed at understanding which pressures have greatest impact on actors’ practice. A framework is proposed for the future role that crowd sourced energy information feedback could play in design, construction and management practice. The final phase synthesises the quantitative and qualitative data to identify what a future crowd sourced data platform must offer to meet the aspirations and motivations of actors working within the contextual pressures and the macro-aim of lower carbon emissions. This concludes with suggested alterations required to the contextual pressures to facilitate this. Recommendations are made for adjustments to the framework to increase participation in building evaluation targeted at the specifics of the energy gap and the motivations of industrial actors. Finally, further work is identified to facilitate and evaluate any future changes to the contextual pressures.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | energy; crowd-sourced; feedback; building design; mixed methods |
| Index terms: | mixed method, carbon emission, platform, low-energy building design, building design, building energy consumption, building evaluation, energy consumption, energy performance, energy gap, interview, observation, motivation, survey, literature review, United Kingdom, practitioner, management practice, methodology, climate change, consumption |
| Subjects: | research methods, sustainable design, Geography, digital design, asset management, consumer economics, practitioner, climate science, psychology, architectural design, management, data collection methods, sustainability and energy, energy systems, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Geographical Context, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here