The challenge of collaboration in urban design: Co-designing resilient public spaces in Chile

Gaete Cruz, M (2025) The challenge of collaboration in urban design: Co-designing resilient public spaces in Chile. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands.

Abstract

Climate change affects cities in every region of the world, and cities need to improve their urban resilience. Resilient measures are often implemented in public spaces because they are the urban voids in which infrastructures, water, biodiversity, mobility, and human life unfold. However, their institutional settings often make their design processes significantly challenging. Many complexities must be agreed upon and integrated into designing resilient public spaces. Taking a collaborative approach to designing public spaces has been said to improve their resilience by involving different actors and integrating their aims and knowledge. However, the mechanisms to do so remain unclear. This research explores how a collaborative approach can contribute to the design processes of resilient public spaces. It does so in the geographical context of Chile, a territory prone to diverse climate change impacts. It poses that revised urban design processes are crucial for implementing resilient public spaces. It focuses on co-design processes and their mechanisms and methods to integrate the diverse knowledge backgrounds of the involved actors. The studies examine the co-design processes of prominent resilient public spaces in Chile and design one in the same context. This research aims to contribute to urban design by formulating a comprehensive framework and guidelines for designing resilient public spaces collaboratively. It contributes generalisable and context-specific findings with particular emphasis on the Chilean context.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: van Bueren, Ellen; Czischke, D K and Ersoy, A
Uncontrolled Keywords: urban design; collaboration; public spaces; resilience; climate change; chile; co-design
Index terms: Chile, biodiversity, mobility, collaboration, public space, urban resilience, climate change, complexity, urban design, design process
Subjects: design methods, sustainability and resilience, biodiversity, management, systems engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, climate science, urban design, urban design and public space, Geography
Topics: Design Practice, Urban Studies, Organizational Design, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here