Circular and adaptable building transformation: Reconceptualization, practice exploration, framework co‑development and implementation

Hamida, M B (2025) Circular and adaptable building transformation: Reconceptualization, practice exploration, framework co‑development and implementation. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands.

Abstract

Existing buildings are changing assets, altered in response to various external or internal triggers for change. Often, change can occur in the form of adaptive reuse – also known as building transformation. Therefore, promoting adaptability in transformation is necessary to cope with the inevitability of building changes. Building transformation is considered an effective practice contributing to the circular economy (CE) and building adaptability as a prerequisite for circular design. However, previous research pointed out that building stakeholders lack knowledge about the alignment between CE and adaptive reuse. This study aims to provide building and real estate practitioners with a guiding framework for promoting circularity and adaptability in adaptive reuse projects. A quadrant research design was used in this study to develop and apply the framework in practice. The four components of this research are four stepwise studies, namely theoretical – an integrative literature review, empirical – multiple case studies, participatory – framework co-development, and actionable – framework implementation. First, the integrative literature review contributed to theoretically conceptualizing the underlying concept of this research – the circular building adaptability (CBA), which brings together circularity and adaptability. Second, the multiple case studies contributed to extracting lessons learned about applicable CBA strategies in adaptive reuse and their enabling and inhibiting factors. Third, the participatory study contributed to co-developing a descriptive framework for CBA in adaptive reuse (CBA-AR). Finally, the action research study contributed to testing and improving the usability and effectiveness of the CBA-AR framework based on observing, acting, and reflecting on a case project.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Thesis advisor: Remøy, H T; Gruis, V H and Greco, A
Uncontrolled Keywords: circular economy; adaptive reuse; building transformation; real estate; framework development; adaptability; circular building adaptability
Index terms: circularity, adaptive reuse, implementation, framework development, circular economy, building adaptability, case study, literature review, strategy, usability, transformation, action research, building stakeholder, exploration, practitioner, lessons learned, testing, adaptability, effectiveness, real estate, research design, adaptable building
Subjects: user-centered design, sustainable design, data analysis and analytics, practitioner, research design and methodology, data collection methods, sociology, environmental resource management, user focus, contractual arrangements, professional development, sustainable materials, professional practice, business, real estate economics, management, building performance, performance management
Topics: Sustainability, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Urban Studies, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here