Papadonikolaki, E (2016) Alignment of partnering with construction it: Exploration and synthesis of network strategies to integrate BIM-enabled supply chains. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands.
Abstract
Supply Chain Management (SCM) and Building Information Modelling (BIM) are seen as innovations that can manage complexities in construction by focusing on integrating processes and products respectively. Whereas these two innovations have been considered compatible, their practical combination has been mainly anecdotal. The Netherlands was the locale of this study, where both SCM and BIM have been popular approaches. The research objective is to explore their real-world combination and propose strategies for the alignment of SCM and BIM, by viewing Supply Chain (SC) partnering as the inter-organisational proxy of SCM. The main question is: "How to align the SCM philosophy with BIM technologies to achieve integration in the construction industry? What aspects contribute to this alignment?". The methodology was mixed and both qualitative and quantitative data were analysed. The overarching method was case study research and the unit of analysis was the firm, also referred to as 'actor'. After a semi-chronological review of the relevant literature, the two constructs of SCM and BIM were found interdependent in product-, process-, and actor-related (P/P/A) dimensions. The study consisted of four other consecutive studies. First, empirical insights into the practical implementation of SC partnering and BIM were obtained via the exploration of five cases. Second, a conceptual model for the quantitative analysis of the product-, process-, and actor-related dimensions was designed. Third, this model and mixed methods were applied to two polar (extreme) cases to analyse the contractual (typically SC-related), digital (typically BIM-related), and informal interactions among the involved actors. Fourth, an additional theoretical exploration of the BIM-enabled SC partnerships took place with focusing also on intra-organisational relations within the involved firms. After the four studies, the findings were systematically combined to create the theoretical synthesis, i.e. generate theory. Three consecutive steps of 'construct', 'internal', and 'external' validity took place after the synthesis, to define the transferability of findings. The systematic combination of findings deduced two routes to achieve SC integration in construction: (a) product-related (emphasis on BIM tools), and (b) actor-related (emphasis on SCM philosophy). The two observed routes to SC integration emerged from the data of the polar cases. Two complementary sets of strategies for SC integration were derived afterwards. These strategies could ease the identification of which route is the 'closest fit' to SC integration, and then support the decision-making of how to pursue it. As the concept of BIM is currently a hot topic, it might be wise to undertake a 'product-related' route to integration and gradually introduce strategies from the 'actor-related' route. However, the 'actor-related' route could attain long-term integration and thus, long-lasting relations among the multi-actor networks. The key aspects of the alignment of partnering with construction IT for BIM-enabled SC partnerships are: - The identification of whether the SC complexity is of process-, product- or actor-related nature; - The deployed BIM collaboration patterns, i.e. ad-hoc, linear or distributed; - The SC coordination mechanisms, e.g. centralised or decentralised; - The relation between formal and informal aspects, e.g. symmetric or asymmetric; - The emerging intra-organisational relations due to BIM and SCM implementation; - The hierarchical level that BIM-enabled SC partnership decision-making pertains. As the construction industry evolves into an information-driven sector, the alignment of construction IT with inter-organisational management is preeminent for managing the inherent complexities of the industry. In parallel, embracing inter-organisational approaches for information management such as BIM is a promisingway forward for SCM and construction management.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Wamelink, J W F and Vrijhoef, R |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | supply chain management; building information modelling; partnering; network strategies; integration; construction; information technology |
| Index terms: | partnership, validity, building information modelling, partnering, mixed method, case study, dimension, interaction, implementation, construction industry, coordination, network strategy, strategy, Netherlands, organizational management, philosophy, Construction IT, quantitative analysis, complexity, information technology, collaboration, integration, exploration, decision-making, methodology |
| Subjects: | management, information systems, systems engineering, industry analysis, philosophical studies, decision analysis, organizational analysis, partnership management, computing systems, business, data collection methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics, data analysis and analytics, Geography, research methods, behavioral psychology, networking, evaluation and assessment methods, contractual arrangements, environmental resource management |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Procurement, Sustainability, Risk Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here