Taneja, P (2013) The flexible port. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands.
Abstract
Ports are beset with many uncertainties about their futures. They are confronted with new demands in terms of functions and scales, new external constraints, and changed expectations. The inability to adequately meet these demands can mean costly adaptations for a port, or loss of cargo and competitive position. A plausible reason is that the traditional practices of port planning have remained static in this dynamic world. Traditional port planners do not habitually think in terms of uncertainty, and therefore propose inflexible plans and designs based on deterministic forecasts. Clearly, a new approach is required. Flexibility helps a port to adapt to a wide range of exogenous developments. This is possible at all levels of a port infrastructure system: in its physical infrastructure, its procedures and operations, and the services it provides. This thesis proposes a method called Adaptive Port Planning (APP). Real-life case studies have established that APP can accommodate diverse planning needs and deliver flexible and robust solutions that can better withstand the vagaries of the future. In reality there are barriers, however. Adoption and successful implementation of APP by organizations involved in port planning and design faces many barriers. The conservative port industry, the nature of port projects constrained by legal procedures that limit flexibility, the traditional role assigned to an engineer doing the planning, the organizational culture that leaves little room for new techniques, the extra investments associated with flexible designs, and the fact that innovation is low priority in times of uncertainty, all represent barriers. A 'strategic planner' is required: a generalist who can take a holistic approach, understand the tasks of an engineer, economist, manager, and a policymaker, and is able to communicate with the many disciplines in his planning team. He must be able to integrate their knowledge, incorporate uncertainty considerations in standards and projects, seek innovative flexible solutions, and justify them to the authorities.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Ligteringen, H and Walker, W E |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | port planning; adaptive planning; infrastructure management; uncertainty; flexibility; strategic planning |
| Index terms: | infrastructure management, implementation, manager, organizational culture, case study, engineer, adaptation, strategic planning, holistic approach, face, physical infrastructure, planner |
| Subjects: | sociology, user focus, infrastructure and transport systems, practitioner, profession, infrastructure engineering, management, contractual arrangements, data collection methods, psychology, business |
| Topics: | Procurement, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here