Caldwell, Scott A (2024) Empirical decision-making tools as applied to seaports in the industry 4.0 paradigm. PhD thesis, Liverpool John Moores University, UK.
Abstract
Purpose:Seaports are regarded as vital nodes within maritime supply chain operations that represent 80% of globalised trade by volume when compared to other nodes of transportation. They represent logistical hubs that constitute as the interface between land and sea transportation, facilitating the processing and storing of a variety of diverse cargoes; break-bulk, liquid, containerised, refrigerated, passenger, and roll-on/ roll-off for on-ward delivery to suppliers and end users.By their operating nature, seaports and container terminals are characterised by conservatism, fragmentation, complexity, and uncertainty making them ideal candidates for strategic decision-support tools that underpin the sustained competitive advantages facilitated by Industry 4.0 embedded technologies.Method:A range of data mapping techniques have been surveyed and the author proposes an observational modelling approach adapted from an existing visualisation technique (Value Stream Mapping/ VSM) as the route to improved strategic decision-support capabilities. The suitability of these techniques to map seaport operations was underpinned by a series of semi-structured interviews, in-depth interviews, and a process walk-through.Research Implications:This approach values practitioner-led, direct measurement and data collection with a process of considered planning for potential future states focused upon digital technologies and automation. The research integrates academic and practitioner literature, facilitating the development of a new mapping technique (Empirical Decision-Making Tools). integrated as part of a decision-support framework.Practical ImplicationsThe EDMTs represent a dynamic range of visualisation tools (Process-Flow Mapping, Supply Chain Data Matrix, Decision-Point Analysis, Accuracy Completeness Amplification Mapping, and Key Characteristics of a Seaport) that are applicable to seaports that vary in size, capacity, handling specification, location, and Industry 4.0 readiness. The increased demand for time-critical decision support is addressed by their adaptability to deliver real-time visualisations of the current operational state that underpin a method of continuous improvement within a future representation of an ideal operating state.This facilitates an enhanced understanding in terms of both asset management and situational awareness of disparate and scarce resources of the seaport (berth occupation duration, labour allocation, crane capacity, throughput rate, and vessel turnaround time).
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Darlington, Rob |
| Index terms: | adaptability, decision support, interview, digital technology, practitioner, paradigm, duration, visualization, complexity, asset management, automation, accuracy, value stream mapping, specification, mapping, occupation, container terminal, suitability, decision-making, industry 4.0, land, competitive advantage, fragmentation, modelling, end user, continuous improvement |
| Subjects: | stakeholder, market analysis, computing systems, practitioner, sociology, decision analysis, design practice, business, spatial and geospatial analysis, transport systems, asset management, contractual condition, design criteria, systems engineering, project controls, analytical methods, performance measurement, user focus, real estate economics, data collection methods, professional development, technology adoption, education and knowledge transfer, automation and robotics |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Urban Studies, Quality Management, Design Practice, Research Practice, Supply Chain Management, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Contract Administration, Time Control, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here