Gomda, Hardi Idris (2024) Leadership and implementation of sustainable construction in Ghana. DELead thesis, University of Charleston - Beckley, USA.
Abstract
This research investigated leadership roles, and the challenges faced in implementing sustainability within Ghana's construction industry. It focused on leadership perspectives and the obstacles encountered in integrating sustainable practices into construction projects. An explanatory sequential mixed methods design was employed, combining quantitative and qualitative approaches to develop a comprehensive understanding of the issue. The quantitative phase utilized statistical techniques to analyze numerical data and test hypotheses, while the qualitative phase involved interviews that explored participants' experiences, opinions, and attitudes. The findings offered valuable insights for industry leaders and policymakers, underscoring the importance of regulatory frameworks and incentive structures in promoting sustainable construction. The study contributed to advancing professional knowledge, improving industry practices, and supporting the broader sustainability agenda in Ghana. Ultimately, the key contribution of this research was its in-depth review of literature on leadership skills essential for driving sustainability in construction, offering a scholarly foundation for future initiatives.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Lonam, Matthew W |
| Index terms: | construction project, leadership role, interview, sustainable construction, construction industry, implementation, mixed method, sustainable practice, qualitative approach, Ghana, professional knowledge |
| Subjects: | leadership, sustainable construction, Geography, production management, research methods, contractual arrangements, industry analysis, sustainable practices, professional development, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Procurement, Sustainability, Project Management, Geographical Context, Human Resources, Research Practice, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here