Mann, P and Wong, D T W (2014) What does the duty of utmost good faith (uberrimae fidei) in insurance contract mean for the construction industry? In: Raiden, A and Aboagye-Nimo, E (eds.) Proceedings of 30th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2014, Portsmouth, UK.
Abstract
This article aims to understand what does the duty of utmost good faith (uberrimae fidei) in insurance contract mean for the construction industry. In construction insurance contracts, the duty of utmost good faith (uberrimae fidei) plays an important role. The analysis of case law shows that an insurer has the right in law to avoid the contract of insurance in its entirety if the insured was guilty of fraud, non-disclosure or misrepresentation before the contract was entered into. It seems to be unjust because even though the insured may be honest, he could still be in breach of duty. Utmost here means that both the insurer and the insured have the duty beyond the reasonable integrity and honesty. Furthermore, the insurer may also have a claim in the case of a breach of utmost good faith during the contract. It proceeds on the basis that the insurer likewise owes the insured a duty of good faith. While sounding good in theory, it can be argued that it may mean very little in practice. In the last decade, the English courts are turning their eyes towards the mutuality of the duty of good faith owed by the insurers to the insured. There is a new practical focus in the construction industry on inducement to balance the risk on the insured and insurer, where the mutuality of the duty of good faith is shifting towards the obligations on the insurers.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction law; insurance contract; uberrimae fidei |
| Index terms: | inducement, insurance, duty, case law, construction industry, good faith, fraud, construction law, integrity |
| Subjects: | contractual role, legal systems, economic analysis, management, health safety and environment, professional ethics, construction law, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Human Resources, Legal Issues, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 CT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here