van der Meer, Jeroen (2021) Raising risk awareness in infrastructure tenders. PhD thesis, University of Twente, Netherlands.
Abstract
Contractors are trying to deal with the increased complexity of projects through the use of systems engineering as a design methodology, to ensure conformity to the specifications and requirements of their design and decision-making processes. The purpose of systems engineering is to gain a better understanding of customer demand and use this understanding to improve decision making throughout the life cycle. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is commonly used to support decision making throughout the entire systems engineering process. MCDA supports conflict resolution and compliance with stakeholder needs, requirements, and preconditions. At the same time, the interactions between requirements, subsystems and preconditions are full of risk because detailed design information, resources and time are scarce in a tender. Consciously managing risk in tenders is essential for preparing a bid since the decisions made in this phase can have significant consequences for both the schedule and the costs. A prerequisite for assessing risk is to be aware of the risks and to perceive a decision as risky. Potential risks are easily neglected or overlooked in a context where time and resources are scarce, available assessment tools are hardly applied and decisions are based on experience and knowledge. This raises the question to what extent contractors are aware of the role of risk in making design decisions and how risk awareness can be raised. The aim of this dissertation is to increase the understanding about the risk awareness of contractors in integrated design decisions during the tender phase of complex infrastructure projects. It also aims at suggesting possible direction for raising risk awareness of contractors when making integrated design decisions.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | Dewulf, Geert; van der Horst, A Q C and Hartmann, Andreas |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | infrastructure tenders; risk awareness; systems engineering; multi-criteria decision analysis; mcdd; design decisions; contractors; project complexity; decision making |
| Index terms: | specification, compliance, methodology, decision-making, design decision, complexity, project complexity, systems engineering, life cycle, decision-making process, conflict resolution, interaction, multi-criteria decision analysis, infrastructure project, dissertation |
| Subjects: | behavioral psychology, health safety and environment, organizational theory, research methods, research dissemination and communication, infrastructure and transport systems, systems engineering, conflict resolution, decision analysis, contractual condition, design practice, value management |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Risk Management, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here