Zhong, Yunshun (2025) Leveraging large language models for intelligent construction management systems. PhD thesis, University of Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
The Construction Management Systems (CMS) domain increasingly depends on unstructured text (inspection reports, technical documents, incident logs), creating an opportunity for domain-aware Natural Language Processing (NLP) with Large Language Models (LLMs). Yet general-domain pre-training often misses domain-specific terminology and context, limiting precision and accuracy for tasks in CMS domain. This gap motivates domain-specific LLMs along two tracks: (i) a discriminative, encoder-based Transformer system for classification and regression on agency documents to support risk assessment, resource allocation, and cost estimation (Chapter 2); and (ii) a generative, decoder-based question-answering system that grounds answers in project documents while leveraging model priors (Chapter 3). The retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and prompt engineering pipeline in Chapter 3 are adapted for various data-mining and analysis tasks across the domain as shown in Chapters 4–5. Chapter 2 develops the first dedicated CMS corpus and an end-to-end pipeline for pre-training language models on domain text. After domain-specific pre-training and fine-tuning, these models outperform general models on two representative tasks, structural condition assessment and building compliance checking, with F1 improvements of 5.9% and 8.5%, respectively, underscoring the value of domain-specific pre-training. Chapter 3 builds an agency-specific project-authoring advisor using RAG with prompt engineering (persona, format template, chain-of-thought, few-shots learning). During evaluation grounded in agency documentation, GPT-4 with RAG and optimized prompts scores 88.9/100, versus 75.7 with RAG only and 53.4 without RAG, and significantly surpasses conventional search methods. Chapters 4 releases a public, metadata-rich dataset of 1,100 CMS publications with annual citations, then compares topic extraction via Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and an automated LLM-RAG pipeline evaluated against expert-labeled topics. The LLM-RAG approach achieves far higher agreement (85.94× Jaccard, 8.14× BLEU, 32.11× ROUGE) and reveals research trends by analyzing topics and citations. Chapter 5 adapts the "Sleeping Beauty" framework to perform the first systematic analysis of papers with delayed recognition in CMS, showing delayed recognition is more prevalent than assumed and cautioning against short-horizon citation metrics. Collectively, this thesis demonstrates that combining domain-specific datasets and pre-training with RAG and specialized prompt engineering delivers accurate, auditable decision support, advancing evidence-based planning, regulatory compliance, and operational efficiency across the CMS sector.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Doctoral) |
|---|---|
| Thesis advisor: | El-Diraby, Tamer and Goodfellow, Sebastian |
| Index terms: | decision support, documents, cost estimating, authoring, accuracy, dataset, agency, inspection, mining, risk assessment, efficiency, resource allocation, management system, documentation, regulatory compliance, compliance, pipeline, publication, large language model, evidence |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, coding, financial and cost management, professional development, quality assurance, performance management, research dissemination and communication, resource management, infrastructure and transport systems, data science, geotechnical engineering, data management, management, evaluation and assessment methods, environmental policy, sociology, financial risk, health safety and environment |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Digital Applications, Site Management, Sustainability, Risk Management, Information Management, Organizational Design, Cost Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here