Introducing a severe impacts approach to guide adaptation to pluvial floods in residential and public buildings

Hjerpe, M; Glaas, E and Storbjörk, S (2025) Introducing a severe impacts approach to guide adaptation to pluvial floods in residential and public buildings. Building Research & Information, 53(7), pp. 817-832. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Damages to buildings from pluvial flooding pose key risks to cities, impacting both economy and health, and drawing increased policy attention. While Swedish buildings are known to be at risk, most research focuses on homeowners and flood exposure. Despite municipal property companies owning a quarter of all apartments in Sweden, less is known about their buildings' risk and adaptation actions. This study addresses this gap by investigating: What do property company staff view as severe pluvial flood impacts? Which building characteristics contribute to pluvial flood risk, particularly severe impacts? What adaptation actions can property companies implement to reduce severe flood impact risk? The study involves collaboration with four Swedish municipal property companies, mapping 2,358 buildings, inspecting 604 buildings, and conducting nine expert workshops. The study suggests a severe impacts approach to guide adaptation to pluvial floods, reducing impacts on: Human lives or health, Critical operations, Evacuation, Critical technical installations, and High-value loss and damage. The study identifies a set of scalable property-level adaptation actions to reduce severe impacts and a typology of adaptation actions, emphasizing property owner responsibility and ability to act. Implementing the severe impacts approach, the typology and scalable actions will increase property companies' capacity to adapt.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adaptation; buildings; cities; pluvial floods; property companies; vulnerability
Index terms: vulnerability, property owner, mapping, collaboration, public building, property company, exposure, high-value, damages, homeowner, drawing, flooding, workshop, adaptation, Sweden
Subjects: management, public and environmental health, sociology, dispute resolution, real estate economics, technical documentation, Geography, spatial and geospatial analysis, environmental hazards, construction type, user focus, economic analysis
Topics: Organizational Design, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Legal Issues, Sustainability, Geographical Context, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here