Cao, Z; Huang, L; Mao, Y; Mustafa, M and Mohd Isa, M H (2025) Bridging conservation and modernity: Evaluation of functional priorities for architectural heritage adaptation in China. Building Research & Information, 53(7), pp. 833-845. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
The conservation of architectural heritage increasingly focuses on modern functional demands. However, while some existing evaluation frameworks incorporate aspects such as social value, many still emphasize structural preservation and aesthetic restoration, often underrepresenting user-centred sustainability. This study designed a template based on focus group interviews with 16 experts and a literature review. A survey involving 425 residents was conducted to evaluate the functional adaptability of heritage buildings. The findings revealed notable gaps between perceived importance and actual performance. Indicators like Ease of Maintenance and Accessible Design were rated as highly important but performed poorly, while Structural Safety and Fire Safety Systems showed strong performance but lower perceived importance. The results indicate a shift in stakeholder priorities, with operational relevance and inclusivity now outweighing traditional safety concerns. By aligning historical preservation with modern usability, the proposed framework promotes sustainable and inclusive heritage adaptation. It offers actionable insights to integrate stakeholder perspectives into evaluations and inform policy and conservation practices.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptive reuse; architectural heritage; functional evaluation; heritage conservation; stakeholder perceptions |
| Index terms: | conservation, fire safety, social value, adaptation, aesthetic, adaptive reuse, restoration, China, heritage building, adaptability, survey, literature review, usability, focus group, evaluation, interview |
| Subjects: | factor and component analysis, Geography, health safety and environment, sustainable design, environmental policy, user focus, construction type, sociology, renovation and retrofit, data analysis and analytics, user-centered design, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Research Practice, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here