Heshmati, K; Shahabpoor, E; Walker, I; Ghanbari, S and Darby, A (2025) The effect of wind-induced vibrations in tall buildings on occupants' work performance. Building Research & Information, 53(8), pp. 949-964. ISSN 0961-3218
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of wind-induced vibrations in tall buildings on occupants' work performance. Controlled experiments were conducted using a specialized motion simulator at University of Bath (VSimulator) to simulate wind-induced vibrations. A comprehensive psychological test battery was developed to measure cognitive abilities–attention, memory, and executive function–as well as subjective work performance. Twenty-one participants completed the test battery under various motion conditions, with peak accelerations both above and below the perception threshold. Unlike previous studies, this paper shows a consistent correlation between work performance and both peak acceleration and frequency of motion. Within the tested range (0–0.1 ms−2), a 0.1 ms−2 increase in peak acceleration was associated with an average decrease of 0.2 standard deviations in cognitive performance, 0.5 Likert-unit decrease in self-reported performance, and 0.4 Likert-unit increase in subjective effort. Furthermore, within the tested range (0–0.5 Hz), a 0.5 Hz increase in frequency was associated with an average decrease of 0.2 standard deviations in cognitive performance. This is the first controlled study of realistic tall building vibrations to show that wind-induced vibrations can potentially impair cognitive performance. The research outcome provides a foundation for future vibration serviceability studies where work performance is central to defining serviceability criteria.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cognitive performance; occupant comfort; peak acceleration; random vibration; vibration acceptability |
| Index terms: | deviation, serviceability criteria, acceleration, work performance, psychological test, executive, comfort, experiment, tall building, vibration, cognitive ability |
| Subjects: | project controls, occupational health and safety management, data collection methods, mechanical systems, financial and cost management, cognitive psychology, assessment methods, practitioner, construction type, professional practice, operations management |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Project Management, Health and Safety, Time Control, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here