Urban façades and human stress: Evaluating façades' texture and layout

Maria, C and Hollander, J B (2025) Urban façades and human stress: Evaluating façades' texture and layout. Building Research & Information, 53(8), pp. 1039-1057. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

The variety of surfaces in urban environments is crucial for understanding human experiences in cities. Surfaces can influence navigation and emotional responses, particularly regarding specific façade characteristics. This study examined how spatial variables of façades-roughness, materiality, solidity-affect emotional stress and the human experience of places. An experiment using iMotions software and selected images of urban façades in New Haven, Connecticut, tracked participants' eye movements and facial reactions to these spatial features. Fifty-two participants with access to a computer contributed data to understand the relationship between stress, cognition, and façade characteristics. The analysis revealed significant correlations between stress levels and specific façade characteristics, supporting our hypothesis. Brighter, softer, and smoother façades positively correlated with gaze patterns and positive emotional expressions, reducing stress. Façades with perforation or semi-solidity façades increased fixation duration, indicating higher affordance. Consistent gaze patterns on solid façades, except semi-solid ones with minimal elements, highlighted the importance of materiality and texture in emotional responses. Emotions such as anger were linked to stimuli causing higher saccadic movements, while joy was associated with brighter stimuli and softer textures. The contrast between conscious reactions to emojis and unconscious data suggests that stress in the built environment significantly impacts subjective well-being.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: eye-tracking; facial expression; spatial cognition; stress; textures
Index terms: duration, experiment, cognition, built environment, affordance, materiality, movement, well-being, urban environment
Subjects: urban sustainability, data collection methods, health behaviours and lifestyles, project controls, sociology, infrastructure and transport systems, behavioral psychology, cognitive psychology, mental health and wellbeing
Topics: Research Practice, Time Control, Business Strategy, Design Practice, Health and Safety, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 3 CTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here