Co-creating interventions to prevent mosquito-borne disease transmission in hospitals

Sloan Wood, O; Lupenza, E; Agnello, D M; Knudsen, J B; Msellem, M; Schiøler, K L and Saleh, F (2025) Co-creating interventions to prevent mosquito-borne disease transmission in hospitals. Buildings & Cities, 6(1), pp. 819-840. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

In regions where mosquito-borne diseases are endemic, like Zanzibar, hospitals may act as transmission hotspots. Preventative interventions designed and co-created with stakeholders in hospital settings may help reduce disease risks and address related user needs. A structured co-creation process, guided by the PRODUCES+ framework and adopting a situated living labs approach, was used to design and implement interventions in four district hospitals from December 2024 to September 2025. Stakeholders and needs were identified through stakeholder mapping and a mixed-methods needs assessment. Participatory workshops using co-creation methods were used to develop the interventions, evaluations conducted, and outcomes reported to participants. Interventions targeting larval source reduction, building and landscape modifications were developed and implemented. Seventy-five participants were engaged, including staff, patients and specialists. Initial evaluation indicated high satisfaction among participants, and capacity-building and preventative behaviours were observed after the process. Co-creation and situating the process within a living labs framework enabled context-specific mosquito control interventions. The approach required adaptability owing to resource and time intensity and ongoing staff or clinical demands. Findings will inform subsequent intervention rounds planned in 2026 and could support the adoption of co-created vector control in similar health care environments.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: co-creation; dengue; hospital design; living labs; malaria; mosquito-borne diseases; Tanzania; vector-borne diseases; zanzibar
Index terms: mapping, health care, adaptability, satisfaction, co-creation, disease transmission, user need, workshop, Tanzania
Subjects: project delivery, Geography, health risk and incident analysis, public and environmental health, design process, user-centered design, spatial and geospatial analysis, user focus, construction type
Topics: Construction Technology, Design Practice, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here