Alaux, N; Kulmer, V; Vogel, J and Passer, A (2025) Preserving buildings: Emission reductions from circular economy strategies in Austria. Buildings & Cities, 6(1), pp. 881-898. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
Buildings exert substantial pressure on global resources and contribute significantly to waste and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. With ambitious targets like Austria's aim for climate neutrality before 2050, assessing the large-scale potential of circular economy strategies is essential for policymaking. However, previous studies at the national level lack details about building components and materials. Using an integrated material flow analysis and prospective life cycle assessment model, three measures are assessed for reducing the embodied GHG emissions of Austria's building stock by 2050: extending building lifespans through renovation, reusing components and recycling materials. Renovation offers the most robust potential, consistently reducing cumulative embodied GHG emissions by 13–15% across all future scenarios. Component reuse provides a more modest 5–8% reduction, with its effectiveness limited by a material mismatch between existing and future buildings, especially under alternative construction scenarios. The potential of recycling is highly variable (3–10%), performing best with a decarbonised energy mix but showing minimal benefit if future construction shifts to low-impact materials. Further work is needed to analyse potential trade-offs from these strategies, such as the impact of lifespan extension or component reuse on the energy efficiency of buildings.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Austria; building preservation; building stock; circularity; component reuse; demolition; embodied carbon; GHG mitigation; life cycle assessment; lifespan extension; material flow analysis; material recycling; renovation |
| Index terms: | greenhouse gas, building component, building lifespan, material flow analysis, mitigation, Austria, life cycle assessment, strategy, building stock, lifespan, embodied carbon, mismatch, effectiveness, renovation, low-impact material, circular economy, circularity, recycling, neutrality, energy mix, energy efficiency |
| Subjects: | energy systems, material degradation and durability, building materials, sustainability and energy, management, renovation and retrofit, performance management, ethical practice, environmental impact, waste management, sustainable materials, climate science, engineering problems, asset management, Geography, sustainable design, material science and engineering, financial risk, architectural elements |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Design Practice, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Business Strategy, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here