Oke, A E; Aliu, J; Agbaje, D H; Ebekozien, A; Aghimien, D O; Leo-Olagbaye, F and Clinton, C (2025) Exploring constraints in integrating indoor environmental quality (IEQ) into building designs: A case of Nigerian quantity surveying firms. Construction Innovation, 25(6), pp. 1657-1679. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study is to identify and evaluate the primary constraints that quantity surveying firms in Nigeria encounter while integrating indoor environmental quality (IEQ) principles into building designs. Design/methodology/approach The study used a quantitative approach by administering a well-structured questionnaire to 114 quantity surveyors. The collected data were analyzed using methods such as frequencies, percentages, mean item scores, Kruskal–Wallis test and exploratory factor analysis. Findings The top five ranked constraints were limited access to funding or financing options, limited availability of green materials, limited availability of insurance for sustainable buildings, limited availability of sustainable design resources and limited diversity and inclusivity within the design profession. Based on the factor analysis, the study identified six clusters of constraints: structural-related constraints, technical-related constraints, financial-related constraints, capacity-related constraints, legal-related constraints and culture-related constraints. Practical implications This study has several practical implications for quantity surveying firms, policymakers and industry stakeholders involved in building design and construction in Nigeria. The findings of this study can also inform future research on the integration of IEQ principles into building designs. Originality/value By identifying and structuring the clusters of constraints faced by quantity surveying firms in Nigeria when implementing IEQ principles, this study provides a novel approach to understanding the challenges associated with IEQ implementation in the building sector. This understanding can guide policymakers, industry stakeholders and quantity surveying firms in developing effective strategies to overcome these constraints and promote IEQ principles in building design and construction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building design; built environment; construction projects; green building; indoor environmental quality; quantity surveying |
| Index terms: | quantity surveying, building design, Nigeria, factor analysis, indoor environmental quality, built environment, profession, funding, insurance, option, implementation, sustainable design, surveying, exploratory factor analysis, quantity surveying firm, strategy, green building, questionnaire, construction project, methodology, sustainable building, integration, financing |
| Subjects: | Geography, production management, sustainable construction, design process, research methods, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, architectural design, institututions, infrastructure and transport systems, statistical analysis, environmental health, organizational analysis, decision analysis, management, design practice, health monitoring assessment and metrics, profession, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Risk Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here