Sharma, N and Laishram, B (2025) Understanding the relevance and impact of the cost of quality in the construction industry: A systematic literature review using prisma. Construction Innovation, 25(6), pp. 1707-1726. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose Construction industry faces challenges in making objective decisions due to monetary value attached to quality. Among various quality management techniques available, cost of quality (COQ) is one such method used to address the concern. However, the absence of measurable COQ factors to monitor quality costs hampers the implementation of COQ framework in the construction industry. Therefore, this study aims to identify COQ factors focused on visible factors (VF) and hidden factors (HF) and the current requirements to achieve it. Design/methodology/approach This study is based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses protocol guidelines. The present study identified 57 articles published between 1992 and 2023 in peer-reviewed journals. Findings The findings reveal 22 factors, which are grouped into four categories based on COQ. Through systematic review, the authors observed limited methodological and theoretical diversity. In fact, there are no quantitative frameworks to calculate COQ. The study, therefore, developed a framework comprising four major routes/paths of COQ factors within the framework. Practical implications The COQ routes developed through this study will enable the practitioners to meticulously categorise VF and HF, facilitating quantifying of quality throughout the lifecycle of project, which is currently absent from the existing quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) approach. In addition, these COQ routes stand as essential construction strategies, significantly enhancing outcomes related to time, cost, quality, sustainability and fostering closer relationships within project frameworks. Originality/value The current study contributes significantly to the existing body of knowledge by developing various COQ routes and proposing future research directions to address gaps in the literature.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; cost of quality; framework; hidden factors; prisma |
| Index terms: | strategy, practitioner, quality assurance, construction industry, systematic literature review, quality management, journal, face, meta-analysis, quality control, lifecycle, methodology, implementation, body of knowledge |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, knowledge management, practitioner, quality assurance, project delivery, research methods, research dissemination and communication, research evaluation and metrics, industry analysis, psychology, management |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Organizational Design, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Procurement, Quality Management, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here