Jia, J and Wu, M (2025) Examining the effectiveness of knowledge governance mechanisms in mobile messaging groups within construction project teams. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(8), pp. 5019-5039. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – Mobile messaging groups (MMGs) have been widely adopted in construction practice, yet, little is known about how to foster knowledge sharing (KS) in MMGs, characterized by communication visibility. This study is thus motivated to investigate mechanisms for KS in this context. Design/methodology/approach – The paper employs knowledge governance theory to construct a theoretical model and develop hypotheses. Specifically, psychological safety is identified as a mediator between knowledge governance mechanism (KGM) and KS, and promotion regulatory focus is identified as a moderator between KGM and psychological safety. Data from 208 Chinese construction project team members are collected to test the proposed theoretical model. Findings – The results suggest that both formal and informal KGM positively affect psychological safety, which in turn improves KS (quantity and quality). Moreover, the mediating role of psychological safety is confirmed, and the moderating role of promotion regulatory focus is validated. Originality/value – This study explores how to foster KS in MMGs, which are pervasive in today's digital age. The findings in this study enhance the understanding of KS in digital environments and afford important insights into knowledge management within construction project teams.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction project team; knowledge governance; knowledge sharing; mobile messaging groups |
| Index terms: | mediator, governance, promotion, construction project team, effectiveness, knowledge sharing, knowledge management, methodology, psychological safety |
| Subjects: | professional development, performance management, management, occupational health and safety management, dispute resolution, business, project delivery, research methods, knowledge management |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Governance, Information Management, Research Practice, Quality Management, Legal Issues, Project Management, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here