Kim, S; Makhmalbaf, A and Shahandashti, M (2025) Forecasting the architecture billings index (abi) using machine learning predictive models. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(8), pp. 5371-5393. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – This research aims to forecast the ABI as a leading indicator of U.S. construction activities, applying multivariate machine learning predictive models over different horizons and utilizing the nonlinear and long-term dependencies between the ABI and macroeconomic and construction market variables. To assess the applicability of the machine learning models, six multivariate machine learning predictive models were developed considering the relationships between the ABI and other construction market and macroeconomic variables. The forecasting performances of the developed predictive models were evaluated in different forecasting scenarios, such as short-term, medium-term, and long-term horizons comparable to the actual timelines of construction projects. Design/methodology/approach – The architecture billings index (ABI) as a macroeconomic indicator is published monthly by the American Institute of Architects (AIA) to evaluate business conditions and track construction market movements. The current research developed multivariate machine learning models to forecast ABI data for different time horizons. Different macroeconomic and construction market variables, including Gross Domestic Product (GDP), Total Nonresidential Construction Spending, Project Inquiries, and Design Contracts data were considered for predicting future ABI values. The forecasting accuracies of the machine learning models were validated and compared using the short-term (one-year-ahead), medium-term (three-year-ahead), and long-term (five-year-ahead) ABI testing datasets. Findings – The experimental results show that Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) provides the highest accuracy among the machine learning and traditional time-series forecasting models such as Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) or seasonal ARIMA in forecasting the ABIs over all the forecasting horizons. This is because of the strengths of LSTM for forecasting temporal time series by solving vanishing or exploding gradient problems and learning long-term dependencies in sequential ABI time series. The findings of this research highlight the applicability of machine learning predictive models for forecasting the ABI as a leading indicator of construction activities, business conditions, and market movements. Practical implications – The architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry practitioners, investment groups, media outlets, and business leaders refer to ABI as a macroeconomic indicator to evaluate business conditions and track construction market movements. It is crucial to forecast the ABI accurately for strategic planning and preemptive risk management in fluctuating AEC business cycles. For example, cost estimators and engineers who forecast the ABI to predict future demand for architectural services and construction activities can prepare and price their bids more strategically to avoid a bid loss or profit loss. Originality/value – The ABI data have been forecasted and modeled using linear time series models. However, linear time series models often fail to capture nonlinear patterns, interactions, and dependencies among variables, which can be handled by machine learning models in a more flexible manner. Despite the strength of machine learning models to capture nonlinear patterns and relationships between variables, the applicability and forecasting performance of multivariate machine learning models have not been investigated for ABI forecasting problems. This research first attempted to forecast ABI data for different time horizons using multivariate machine learning predictive models using different macroeconomic and construction market variables.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architecture; construction; decision support systems; experimental studies; methodology |
| Index terms: | decision support, testing, construction market, media, interaction, architectural service, methodology, dataset, accuracy, profit, movement, architect, macroeconomic variable, engineer, strategic planning, time series, economic indicator, cost estimator, experiment, forecasting, construction spending, construction project, practitioner, construction activity, machine learning, gross domestic product, vector error correction model, risk management |
| Subjects: | practice management, decision analysis, data analysis and analytics, research methods, professional development, construction operations, practitioner, data science, market analysis, economic analysis, behavioral psychology, prediction and forecasting, production management, data collection methods, sociology, profession, professional practice, health behaviours and lifestyles, data management, risk assessment, management, artificial intelligence |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Digital Applications, Information Management, Risk Management, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here