Requirement engineering and project performance: Mediating effect of communication effectiveness, change readiness, stakeholder engagement and moderating effect of team cohesion

Ali, J A; Al-Kharusi, S; Khwaja, M G; Razzak, M R and Bashir, S (2025) Requirement engineering and project performance: Mediating effect of communication effectiveness, change readiness, stakeholder engagement and moderating effect of team cohesion. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(8), pp. 5484-5507. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to investigate the influence of requirement engineering (RE) on project performance (PP) in the context of NEOM* in Saudi Arabia. The study also aims to examine the relationship between three components of RE, evolving market needs (ECN), market changes (MC) and technological advancements (TA), on PP, through the mediating influence of effective communication (EC), change readiness (CR) and stakeholder engagement (SE). Further, the study aims to examine the moderating effect of team cohesion (TC) on the RE–PP relationships. Design/methodology/approach – A research framework is developed by drawing on the resource-based theory and with the support of empirical evidence and rational arguments to propose a set of hypotheses relating to the constructs in the framework. The hypotheses are tested through survey data collected from individual employees working on different projects across NEOM. A total of 336 useable responses were collected that were analyzed through covariance-based structural equation modeling using AMOS v.28. Findings – The results show although ECN and TA both have a positive impact on PP, MC had no significant relationship with PP. In terms of the mediation hypotheses, EC, CR and SE all partially mediate the relationships between ECN and TA with PP. However, there was no mediating effect in the relationship between MC and PP. Moreover, EC, CR and SE themselves have a significant positive influence on PP. Finally, TC proved to be a significant moderator between ECN and PP and TA and PP, but not in the case of MC and PP. Originality/value – This study makes three novel contributions. First, most prior empirical studies examined the overall impact of RE on PP; however, the current study provides a more nuanced insight into the relationships between the three components of RE (i.e. ECN, MC and TA) and PP. Second, the mediating roles of EC, CR and SE between components of RE and PP present a finer-grained understanding of how project resources are linked to project success goals through features of the project team. Third, moderating influence of TC with regard to a higher possibility of success for projects are highlighted through this discovery.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: change readiness; effective communication; neom; project management; project performance; requirement engineering; Saudi Arabia; stakeholder engagement
Index terms: effectiveness, stakeholder engagement, project performance, empirical study, project team, project management, Saudi Arabia, project success, evidence, methodology, mediation, survey, resource-based theory, cohesion, drawing, structural equation modelling
Subjects: Geography, structural engineering, research methods, evaluation and assessment methods, statistical analysis, project management theory and practice, management, performance management, project delivery, technical documentation, community and social dimensions, dispute resolution, data collection methods
Topics: Quality Management, Legal Issues, Geographical Context, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Design Practice, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here