Analyzing the differential impact of variables on the success of solicited and unsolicited private participation in infrastructure projects using machine learning techniques

Ayat, M; Ullah, M; Pervez, Z; Lawrence, J; Kang, C W and Ullah, A (2025) Analyzing the differential impact of variables on the success of solicited and unsolicited private participation in infrastructure projects using machine learning techniques. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(12), pp. 7909-7937. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose – The study aims to examine the impact of key variables on the success of solicited and unsolicited private participation in infrastructure (PPI) projects using machine learning techniques. Design/methodology/approach – The data has information on 8, 674 PPI projects primarily derived from the World Bank database. In the study, a machine learning framework has been used to highlight the variables important for solicited and unsolicited projects. The framework addresses the data-related challenges using imputation, oversampling and standardization techniques. Further, it uses Random forest, Artificial neural network and Logistics regression for classification and a group of diverse metrics for assessing the performances of these classifiers. Findings – The results show that around half of the variables similarly impact both solicited and unsolicited projects. However, some other important variables, particularly, institutional factors, have different levels of impact on both projects, which have been previously ignored. This may explain the reason for higher failure rates of unsolicited projects. Practical implications – This study provides specific inputs to investors, policymakers and practitioners related to the impacts of several variables on solicited and unsolicited projects separately, which will help them in project planning and implementation. Originality/value – The study highlights the differential impact of variables for solicited and unsolicited projects, challenging the previously assumed uniformity of impact of the given set of variables including institutional factors.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: critical success factors; PPI projects; project contexts; solicited proposal; unsolicited proposal
Index terms: standardization, implementation, infrastructure project, investor, database, World Bank, practitioner, methodology, project planning, critical success factor, machine learning, proposal, forest, artificial neural network
Subjects: control systems, artificial intelligence, institutional frameworks, modelling and simulation, performance measurement, infrastructure and transport systems, data management, sociology, practitioner, contractual arrangements, environmental science, project planning, research methods
Topics: Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Governance, Digital Applications, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Sustainability, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here