Menezes-Firmino, M J; Alencar, L H and Olbina, S (2025) Framework for implementing an agile-BIM in Brazilian public organizations based on the value-focused thinking method. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(12), pp. 8021-8055. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – This research purpose was to develop a Value-Focused Thinking (VFT)-based framework for implementing an Agile-BIM in public institutions in Brazil. The framework is used for structuring an action plan for implementing the Agile-BIM. Design/methodology/approach – The methodology used to structure the Agile-BIM implementation framework is based on the VFT method, which enables a decision-maker's strategic, fundamental and means-end objectives for the context analyzed to be more easily identified and better understood. The network developed shapes the decision context, shows possible paths toward achieving the fundamental objectives and guides the institution under study on the implementation process. Based on the networks of two decision-makers and the implementation factors identified, the Agile-BIM implementation framework is proposed. Findings – The study developed an Agile-BIM implementation framework that provides guidance for creating an Agile-BIM implementation plan in a public sector construction project and supports decision-making, in addition to clarifying the decision context for decision-makers and other actors involved. The framework consists of three main dimensions: "Project Stakeholder, " "Technology Infrastructure" and "Standardization and Procedures." Each dimension comprises several factors that contribute to the Agile-BIM implementation process. The findings show that a structured approach to Agile-BIM implementation can support institutions in achieving a smooth and structured transition to BIM usage, thereby ensuring enhanced performance and compliance with legal requirements. Practical implications – The proposed framework can support the assessment of organizational needs and serves as a basis for guiding the implementation of Agile-BIM in public institutions. This framework for Agile-BIM implementation can guide other public institutions in formulating their action plans for implementing Agile-BIM. The framework demonstrates potential for being applicable in different contexts and being able to adapt to these. It can be transferred to other emerging and/or developing countries that are seeking to embrace Agile-BIM while considering the requisite adjustments inherent to each organization. Originality/value – The originality of this study lies in addressing the implementation of BIM in the public sector as a decision problem and using the values of the manager who is in charge in the institution to structure the Agile-BIM implementation, based on the VFT method. Furthermore, it proposes an implementation framework that integrates agile methodologies and BIM, known as Agile-BIM.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | agile methodologies; building information modelling; decision-making; problem structuring; public building management; public sector implementation; value-focused thinking |
| Index terms: | developing country, decision-making, implementation, public building, building information modelling, standardization, Brazil, manager, compliance, construction project, dimension, project stakeholder, methodology, public sector |
| Subjects: | administrative law, Geography, research methods, production management, performance measurement, health safety and environment, information systems, development economics, contractual arrangements, practitioner, sociology, decision analysis, construction type, health monitoring assessment and metrics |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Geographical Context, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, International Construction, Risk Management, Construction Technology, Legal Issues, Research Practice, Quality Management, Project Management, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here