Li, X; Chen, R; Chen, W and Jim, C Y (2025) Safety-risk assessment system for prefabricated building construction in China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(12), pp. 8073-8096. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – Prefabricated building (PB) uses factory production and onsite assembly, which differs from traditional construction methods. This special construction approach may lead to dissimilar safety risks and challenges. Traditional safety assessment methods may not adequately and accurately assess the safety risks of PB construction. This paper aims to develop a new concept and methodology for targeted improvement in assessing PB safety risks. Design/methodology/approach – Risk factors and indicators were established based on literature review and expert inputs. A structural equation model (SEM) was developed to investigate the relationships among three main risk categories: objects, workers and management. SEM analyzed the intricate associations between indicators and deepened understanding of safety risks. The model was tailored for China's PB construction projects to enhance safety-risk management. Findings – The cloud model evaluation validated the SEM model. A PB case study project tested and verified the model, evaluated its efficacy and quantified its safety performance and grade. We identified significant safety risk impacts across the three risk categories, safety-control level and specific areas that require improvement. The SEM model established a robust safety evaluation indicator system for comprehensive safety assessment of PB construction. Practical implications – Practical recommendations provide valuable insights for decision-makers to enhance construction efficiency without compromising safety. This study contributed to the conceptual foundation and devised a novel method for evaluating safety performance in PB construction for safer and more efficient practices. Originality/value – This study departed from the traditional method of calculating weights, opting instead for the SEM method to determine the weights of individual risk indicators. Additionally, we leveraged the cloud model to mitigate the influence of subjective factors in analyzing questionnaire survey responses. The feasibility and reliability of our proposed method were rigorously tested and verified by applying it to the PB case.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | management risk; object risk; prefabricated building construction; safety-risk assessment system; structural equation model; worker risk |
| Index terms: | traditional construction, case study, management risk, onsite, efficiency, risk management, risk factor, structural equation model, risk assessment, prefabricated building, risk impact, survey, literature review, questionnaire, construction project, methodology, safety performance, China |
| Subjects: | risk assessment, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, performance management, occupational health and safety management, statistical analysis, research methods, financial risk, Geography, production management, building construction, environmental hazards, heritage and conservation |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Risk Management, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Project Management, Geographical Context, Design Practice, Construction Technology, Cost Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here