Research on the evaluation method for safety cognitive ability of workers in high-risk construction positions

Cheng, L; Ren, H; Guo, H and Cao, D (2025) Research on the evaluation method for safety cognitive ability of workers in high-risk construction positions. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(12), pp. 8196-8218. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose – Safety cognitive ability is a key factor influencing unsafe behavior. However, the existing achievements have not yet involved the division of the hierarchical relationship of factors influencing safety cognition and lack a quantitative evaluation system of safety cognitive ability. The purpose of this paper is to find out the deficiencies in the safety cognition of workers in high-risk construction positions and to provide practical suggestions for improving their safety cognitive ability and reducing unsafe behavior. Design/methodology/approach – Based on the iceberg model, the factors influencing the safety cognitive ability of workers in high-risk construction positions and their hierarchical relationship were determined, and an evaluation index system consisting of four primary indicators and 20 secondary indicators was constructed. The game theory algorithm was used to optimize the subjective and objective weights of the indicators calculated by the sequential analysis method (G1) and the entropy weighting method (EWM) to obtain the optimal combination weight value. The Matlab software was used for cloud mapping and similarity calculation to determine the safety cognitive ability level of the object to be evaluated. Findings – The research results indicate that the comprehensive level of safety cognitive ability of scaffolders in this construction project is at "Level III", the fundamental factors and compliance factors are at "Level IV", the auxiliary factors and driving factors are at "Level III". This conclusion aligns with the situation learned from the previous field investigation, which validates the feasibility and scientificity of the proposed evaluation method. Research limitations/implications – Considering that the safety cognitive ability of construction workers is constantly changing, this study has not yet delved into the specific impacts of various influencing factors on the level of safety cognitive ability. Future research can utilize simulation software, such as MATLAB and Vensim, to construct dynamic simulation models that accurately simulate the changing rules of construction workers' safety cognitive ability under the influence of different factors. Practical implications – This research broadens the application scope of the iceberg model, enriches the analysis model of the factors influencing the safety cognitive ability of workers in high-risk construction positions and provides a novel perspective for similar research. The safety cognitive ability evaluation method proposed in this paper can not only accurately evaluate the safety cognitive ability level of workers in high-risk positions such as scaffolders but also provide practical suggestions for improving the safety cognitive ability of workers, which is of great significance to improve the safety management level and reduce unsafe behavior in the construction field. Originality/value – This research fills the research gap of workers in high-risk construction positions and the quantification of safety cognitive ability. The iceberg model is used to realize the hierarchical division of the factors influencing safety cognitive ability. Additionally, an evaluation method for the safety cognitive ability of workers in high-risk construction positions based on the game theory combination weighting method and cloud model is proposed, which realizes the quantitative evaluation of safety cognitive ability.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building construction; cloud model; game theory combination weighting method; high-risk positions; iceberg model; safety cognitive ability
Index terms: unsafe behaviour, entropy, compliance, game theory, building construction, cognition, construction project, methodology, cognitive ability, mapping, scaffolder, safety management, influencing factor, quantification, investigation, construction worker
Subjects: research methods, spatial and geospatial analysis, financial risk, health safety and environment, production management, building construction, cognitive psychology, practitioner, measurement and scaling, occupational health and safety management, thermal systems, risk assessment, data collection methods, decision models
Topics: Cost Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Project Management, Risk Management, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here