Cheng, M; Chong, H Y; Liu, G and Li, Q (2025) Strategies of perceived justice for added value in public-private partnership (PPP) projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(12), pp. 8548-8570. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – Perceived justice is crucial to achieving public–private partnership (PPP) projects' goals, but little is known about the transmission mechanism of perceived justice that affects added value in PPP projects. Therefore, this research intends to investigate the link between perceived justice and PPP projects' added value and their underlying mechanism by analysing the mediating role of cooperative behaviour. Design/methodology/approach – Based on 246 valid survey data collected from the Chinese PPP professionals, structural equation modelling was adopted to analyse and test the proposed hypotheses. Findings – The results show all three dimensions of perceived justice positively correlated with PPP projects' added value. The influence effect from high to low was determined to be as follows: interactive, distributive and procedural justice. Moreover, both perfunctory and consummate performance were found to be positively correlated with and thus of great importance to PPP projects' added value, but perfunctory performance was found to have a greater influence coefficient. The relationship between perceived justice and PPP projects' added value is mediated by perfunctory and consummate performance. Therefore, the strategies of perceived justice in improving added value are verified in the context of Chinese PPP projects. Research limitations/implications – The findings of this study can help realise added value in three ways. Firstly, new perspectives for PPP project added value should be proposed by combining the improvement of project basic objectives and the realisation of the participants' implicit demands. Secondly, the effects of different perceived justice on added value should be analysed instead of a single dimension of perceived justice. Thirdly, the mediating effects of different types of cooperative behaviour that may influence the relationship between perceived justice and added value should be evaluated. Practical implications – This study contributes to a better understanding of the relationship between perceived justice and PPP projects' added value and provides a reliable reference for project managers to achieve added value outcomes in PPP projects. In addition, this study reveals the impact of perceived justice on PPP projects' added value and the path of perceived justice transformation. This provides a useful reference for project managers to take advantage of the positive effects of distributive, interactive and procedural justice to enhance inter-organizational cooperative behaviour. This study thus helps improve the practice and value of PPP projects by using the right strategy of perceived justice. Originality/value – The research clarifies the impacts of multidimensional perceived justice for added value of PPP projects throughout the implementation process. It offers a new perspective on PPP projects' added value by combining the improvement of the realisation of participants' implicit claims.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | added value; cooperative behaviour; perceived justice; PPP projects; strategies |
| Index terms: | methodology, cooperative behaviour, justice, survey, structural equation modelling, strategy, implementation, dimension, project manager, added value, transformation, partnership |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, partnership management, management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, profession, data collection methods, business, research methods, legal systems, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, psychology |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Health and Safety, Procurement, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here