Plantinga, H E C; Voordijk, J T and Dorée, A G (2014) Assessing qualification systems: The relevance of explicating implicit reasoning. In: Raiden, A and Aboagye-Nimo, E (eds.) Proceedings of 30th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2014, Portsmouth, UK.
Abstract
In public procurement, most contractors view the qualifying procedures they are obliged to follow as time consuming and wasteful. For one category of public clients, EU rules offer an alternative to qualifying for each project. Public clients operating in the water, energy, transport or telecommunications sectors may establish and operate a so-called "qualification system". This offers contractors the opportunity to qualify for a period of time rather than an individual project. The reasons for applying such a qualification system seem traditionally to be rooted in reducing transaction costs, particularly where the administrative demands are significant relative to the typical value of contracts. As such, it may seem self-evident that a client’s choice between the two approaches should be based on cost efficiency considerations. However, cost efficiency may not be the only motive behind employing a qualification system. A case study is presented here that examines the evolution of such a system and the corresponding reasoning by its operator. While exploring the usability of a conceptual model for managing procurement knowledge, additional reasons for operating the qualification system are reconstructed by exposing the implicit organizational knowledge. Initial results show that formal reasons are combined with implicit ones. These implicit reasons are found to be key in explaining the current utilization of the qualification system. Over time, implicit reasons get included in the reasoning process and come to dominate the original formal reasons. Without proper explication of these reasons, the real value of the qualification system may remain undetected. The contributions of this paper are twofold. First, it reports a case study in which the usability of a model developed for managing procurement knowledge is explored. Second, this paper offers a first insight into the evolution of a qualification system and the corresponding reasoning by its operator.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | implicit knowledge; public procurement; qualification system |
| Index terms: | case study, transaction cost, reasoning, cost efficiency, motive, qualification, public client, evolution, usability, telecommunication |
| Subjects: | cognitive psychology, environmental science, sociology, psychology, communication, data collection methods, economics, financial analysis, educational resources, user-centered design |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Design Practice, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Human Resources, Cost Management, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here