Ikuabe, M; Clinton, C; Ebekozien, A and Mambane, S (2025) Contextualising the challenges of the built environment programme accreditation in HEIs in South Africa. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 43(8), pp. 108-123. ISSN 2398-4708
Abstract
Purpose – The accreditation of built environment programmes is a quality assurance measure which seeks to ensure defined deliverables are continuously met. This study presents the findings of the explored challenges associated with built environment programme accreditation in higher education institutions (HEIs) in South Africa. This is done with a view to proffer formidable recommendations to help improve the processes involved in accreditation of built environment programmes. Design/methodology/approach – The study employed a quantitative approach, necessitating the collection of responses from a defined sample of respondents aided by a structured questionnaire. The data analysis phase of the study was designed using a four-pronged approach comprising descriptive and inferential statistics. Findings – The outcome of the analysis conducted shows that the most rated challenges facing the accreditation of built environment programmes are a lack of funding and insufficient accreditation assessors. Furthermore, the result of the EFA derived five constructs: assessors' challenges in programme accreditation, institutional challenges in programme accreditation, teaching and learning challenges, lack of support services and resistance to change and financial and technical challenges. Practical implications – The study's outcome can inform policy reforms to streamline the process and enhance consistency in evaluations of the delivery of accreditation of programmes in the built environment. Originality/value – From a South African perspective, no study has been conducted to explore the challenges faced in accreditation of built environment programmes. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by shoring up this gap in knowledge.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | accreditation; built environment; challenges; HEIs; South Africa |
| Index terms: | questionnaire, methodology, body of knowledge, South Africa, data analysis, quality assurance, programme, built environment, funding, statistics, higher education institution |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, educational institutions, project controls, data analysis and analytics, mathematical modelling, data collection methods, quality assurance, Geography, research methods, economic analysis, knowledge management |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Education, Geographical Context, Urban Studies, Time Control, Information Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here