Hamerski, D C; Formoso, C T and Isatto, E L (2025) Integrating lean production and agile project management: A planning and control model for multi-project environments in construction. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(12), pp. 1432-1441. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
The Last Planner System (LPS) and Scrum are established planning and control methods that have produced positive results in managing complex projects. They are based on two different but overlapping theoretical frameworks: Lean Production and Agile Project Management. However, there is a lack of academic studies on how to combine those methods and whether their theoretical underpinnings are compatible. Furthermore, previous studies about those methods have not addressed the context of multiple projects developed simultaneously, and the connections between project management from the perspective of client organisations and production management from the perspective of suppliers. This research work proposes a planning and control model for this context. Using Design Science Research (DSR), an empirical study was carried out at a department store company in Brazil. The practical contributions of this study are related to adapting and combining LPS and Scrum elements to the context investigated. The model includes innovative practices, such as integrated look-ahead planning meetings between the project and the production management levels and using Scrum practices to remove certain constraints. This study also sheds light on the commonalities and differences between LPS and Scrum based on how they support the application of important production principles in construction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction projects; last planner system; multi project environments; planning and control; scrum |
| Index terms: | control method, project management, complex project, empirical study, lean production, client organization, Brazil, design science research, production management, construction project, last planner system |
| Subjects: | client relations, strategic project management, production management, Geography, research methods, manufacturing engineering, project delivery, project management theory and practice, monitoring and control, design practice, project controls |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Design Practice, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here