Banihashemi, S; Assadimoghadam, A; Hajirasouli, A; LeNguyen, K and Mohandes, S R (2025) Parametric design in construction: A new paradigm for quality management and defect reduction. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(13), pp. 1534-1551. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
In the realm of construction, the iterative occurrence of design defects during the latter stages frequently jeopardizes building quality, leading to considerable repercussions. Despite extensive research into the causation of design and construction defects and methods to enhance quality outcomes, a noticeable gap persists in comprehensively understanding how parametric design influences building quality. Hence, this study probes the intricate relationship between parametric design and building quality, aiming to forge a conceptual framework that encapsulates their interplay and collective impact on construction excellence. Through a meticulous literature review, the pivotal elements such as design defects, documentation errors, construction technologies, building performance, defect management, cost and time efficiencies, and quality control mechanisms were investigated. The research delineates the pivotal factors that bolster building quality and curtail defects, with a spotlight on integrating parametric design into the fabric of construction quality management. By weaving together current literature insights and focusing on a symbiotic integration of parametric design, this study contributes a novel conceptual framework that stands to advance architectural practices and elevate the paradigm of building quality.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architectural design; building quality; construction defects; parametric design; parametric design thinking |
| Index terms: | construction quality, documentation, integration, conceptual framework, architectural design, architectural practice, construction defect, parametric design, defect management, time efficiency, design defect, building performance, literature review, construction technology, quality control, paradigm, quality management, design and construction |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, professional development, organizational analysis, theoretical framing, contract obligations, quality assurance, data analysis and analytics, digital engineering, management, project delivery, education and knowledge transfer, professional practice, business, design methods, design practice |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Business Strategy, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Information Management, Quality Management, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here