Robinson, W and Chan, P (2014) Servitization in construction: Towards a focus on transitional routines. In: Raiden, A and Aboagye-Nimo, E (eds.) Proceedings of 30th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2014, Portsmouth, UK.
Abstract
Construction firms are increasingly compelled to take into account the through-life performance of the buildings they create. In this article, we examine these trends in relation to the Product-Service literature (commonly referred to as ÔservitizationÕ) to explore the implications of new business models within the construction industry. It was found that while the range of promising opportunities and problems of greater servitization in the construction industry have been widely explored, there remains a limited understanding of the conditions and consequences of transitional practices involved in greater servitization. Therefore, through the review of the servitization literature, we identify the need to refocus research attention on organizational routines and practices as the unit of analysis to better understand how organisations can make the transition towards more servitized offerings. Rather than taking servitization as the starting point for overhauling existing routines, we argue for the need to study routines as they evolve, to see how a servitization culture is gradually incorporated in everyday management in construction. Thus, the contribution of this article is to propose a shift away from viewing servitization simply as the imposition of a new business model, but rather by mash-ups of existing, complementary and contradictory routines that organisations realise as they make sense of servitization in practice rather than in theory.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | organisational practices; product-service models; routine; transition |
| Index terms: | routine, construction firm, servitization, business model, organizational routine, construction industry |
| Subjects: | business, organization, industry analysis, sociology, market strategies |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here