Daniel, C and Neufville, E K (2025) An autogluon-enabled robust machine learning model for concrete tensile and compressive strength forecast. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(13), pp. 1636-1647. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Accurately predicting the compressive and tensile strength of concrete is crucial for the safety and dependability of infrastructure design and construction. Traditional empirical models, however, often fall short in prediction accuracy due to the intricate, nonlinear relationship between concrete strength and properties. This study introduces an innovative AutoGluon-Shapley additive explanations approach, which automates compressive and tensile strength prediction while providing meaningful result interpretations. Using the ConcreteXAI dataset of 3460 samples, electrical resistivity and ultrasonic pulse velocity were selected as input parameters for the models. 80% of the dataset was used for training while 20% was allocated for testing the AutoGluon-enabled models. The results demonstrate that the optimal compressive and tensile strength prediction models achieved root mean square errors of 1.38 and 0.11 MPa, respectively, in the testing phase. The analysis of input parameters revealed that ultrasonic pulse velocity was consistently a more reliable predictor for strength than electrical resistivity. The study concludes with a model that accurately predicts concrete compressive and tensile strength. The research limitation includes the use of only two input variables and the forecast of only compressive and tensile strengths. Future research may incorporate additional input and output parameters, including thermal conductivity and durability.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | autogluon; compressive strength; graphical user interface; non-destructive tests; tensile strength |
| Index terms: | tensile strength, testing, thermal conductivity, design and construction, accuracy, machine learning, dataset, mean square error, user interface, durability, prediction model, compressive strength |
| Subjects: | material properties and characteristics, professional practice, artificial intelligence, data management, human-computer interaction, prediction and forecasting, material analysis and testing, probability and distributions, material degradation and durability, contractual arrangements, professional development |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Construction Materials, Digital Applications, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here