Using appropriate tools and techniques for risk identification in UK construction's SMEs

Rostami, A; Sommerville, J; Wong, I L and Lee, C (2014) Using appropriate tools and techniques for risk identification in UK construction's SMEs. In: Raiden, A and Aboagye-Nimo, E (eds.) Proceedings of 30th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2014, Portsmouth, UK.

Abstract

Risk Management (RM) techniques are important for any organisation. Those firms that have implemented a RM process have recognised that there would be a higher probability of failure if appropriate techniques are not carefully employed during the risk identification stage. This requires proportionate selection of techniques that are compatible with the organisations' needs and limited resources. A literature review on RM indicates the inadequacy in a number of empirical studies done on how techniques influence the RM process. This work investigates the efficacy of the techniques of risk identification within Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in the UK construction industry. Results from a questionnaire survey shows the challenges faced by SMEs in undertaking risk identification and highlights the most common techniques adopted among 153 organisations. Documentation review, expert judgment and checklist analysis are seen as the most important techniques within risk identification; which are practiced for their valuable results, uncomplicated processes and easy to understand structure. Conversely, the group-based techniques like brainstorming and Delphi techniques because of SMEs' inadequate level of knowledge and resources are less practised.

Item Type: Conference Paper (Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords: risk identification; risk management; small and medium enterprises
Index terms: empirical study, Delphi technique, questionnaire, risk management, construction industry, judgment, literature review, survey, risk identification, documentation
Subjects: financial risk, professional development, research methods, industry analysis, dispute resolution, risk assessment, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics
Topics: Research Practice, Information Management, Cost Management, Risk Management, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here