Karunasena, G; Wijeratne, W M P U; Gajanayake, A; Udawatta, N and Perera, S (2025) Stakeholder analysis of construction liquid waste management in Victoria, Australia. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(14), pp. 1691-1702. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Construction sites generate liquid waste, and improper management can cause significant environmental and human impacts. Recent research in Australia revealed that multiple stakeholders with diverse interest and their lack of coordination impact the management of liquid waste. Thus, the study aimed to analyze the stakeholders in the construction liquid waste management process in Victoria, Australia, to understand the communication and coordination mechanisms present among them. The study used a questionnaire survey to identify stakeholder power, awareness, interest, support, and stakeholder networks in construction liquid waste management. Focus group was used to validate the findings from the survey. The findings show that public authorities, water corporations, local councils, building authorities, and construction companies are the key parties involved in the construction liquid waste management process. It was identified that lack of relationship between key stakeholders; lack of education, knowledge, and awareness; lack of liquid waste management requirements in building codes; and lack of strategic involvement of water corporations as four key limitations. Five strategies were identified to improve the liquid waste management process and foster the relationship among stakeholders. The findings will help as an initial step to streamline construction liquid waste management processes by clearly defining the responsibilities among key stakeholders.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; liquid waste management; stakeholder analysis; trade waste; waste; wastewater |
| Index terms: | construction company, survey, stakeholder analysis, strategy, construction site, focus group, public authority, building code, waste management, stakeholder network, questionnaire, Australia, human impact, Victoria, coordination |
| Subjects: | Geography, waste management, environmental impact, organization, administrative law, regulatory law, management, participation process, regions and continents, work location, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Geographical Context, Sustainability, Site Management, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here