Patel, T; Scheepbouwer, E and van der Walt, J D (2025) Optimizing infrastructure procurement: A predictive model for procurement delivery method selection in New Zealand context. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(14), pp. 1736-1748. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Procurement delivery method selection is critical for successful construction projects, enabling informed decisions, efficient capacity management, risk minimization, and optimal outcomes. Traditional selection methods, such as weightage systems, often require extensive features, data, and assessments, which can be subjective and biased, leading to suboptimal decision-making and hindering strategic planning. Hence, this study aims to develop a data-driven procurement delivery method selection tool, leveraging machine learning as a decision support system tailored for New Zealand's infrastructure. A dataset of 2,276 infrastructure pipeline projects with project-related features from New Zealand Infracom was used to train machine learning models through the Bagging Ensemble technique. Models, including SVM, AdaBoost, KNN, Random Forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM, were evaluated to identify the best performer in predicting procurement delivery methods. Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) combined with SMOTE were applied for data augmentation, enhancing robustness and accuracy. Random Forest achieved the highest accuracy (92.58%), followed by XGBoost (92.25%) and LightGBM (91.92%), with validation on an external dataset confirming 95.82% accuracy and reliability. By incorporating evidence-based decision-support tools, this research equips stakeholders with actionable insights, supporting informed and strategic infrastructure procurement and capacity building.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; data-driven; decision support system; infrastructure; machine learning; New Zealand; procurement delivery method; risk |
| Index terms: | pipeline construction, dataset, accuracy, minimization, machine learning, capacity building, selection method, validation, delivery method, evidence, strategic planning, New Zealand, decision-making, decision support, construction project, forest |
| Subjects: | Geography, tendering, algorithms, decision analysis, evaluation and assessment methods, production management, social and economic development, environmental science, artificial intelligence, data management, management, civil engineering, delivery method, professional development |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Information Management, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Geographical Context, Human Resources, Procurement, Project Management, Sustainability, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here