Nonconformity in social service space use: A case study of injibara town's plan implementation

Workineh, N; Terefe, B and Nigussie, W (2025) Nonconformity in social service space use: A case study of injibara town's plan implementation. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(14), pp. 1755-1768. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the nonconformity in social service space use in Injibara town, focusing on the deviations of social service space use from the plan, which was a significant issue in the town. It aimed to identify the social service space use that deviated most as well as the social service space use deviation influenced most by politicians. The study employed geospatial analysis, resident surveys, and interviews with relevant professionals. Document analysis and Henry Garrett's ranking technique were also utilized in the investigation. The findings revealed notable nonconformities. Every social service space use either increased or decreased from their plan. Education emerged as the area with the highest deviation, while politicians significantly influenced worship places. The study faced limitations due to institutional, budgetary, technological, and time constraints, but researchers diligently collected accurate data. The study also recommended the establishment and enforcement of effective national and regional policies to address nonconformity in planning. It also emphasizes the need to tackle improper influence from politicians. Furthermore, the study suggests conducting further research on the impacts of nonconformity, including its effects on residents, to inform comprehensive urban development strategies.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: injibara town; nonconformity; plan; social service; space-use
Index terms: document analysis, deviation, case study, implementation, enforcement, urban development, investigation, survey, strategy, interview, geospatial analysis
Subjects: data science, financial and cost management, data collection methods, management, contractual arrangements, spatial and geospatial analysis, health safety and environment, urban design
Topics: Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Urban Studies, Procurement, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here