Enhancing the accuracy of construction project completion estimates by incorporating updated timing-based error margins (utems)

Khanh, K D; Minh, N V and Dinh Thuc, L (2025) Enhancing the accuracy of construction project completion estimates by incorporating updated timing-based error margins (utems). International Journal of Construction Management, 25(15), pp. 1859-1868. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

The Earned Value Method (EVM) has been used to predict project performance for many years, with numerous studies confirming its reliability and highlighting its advantages and limitations. However, using simple methods to predict highly reliable project outcomes remains crucial for engineers and managers during project implementation. This study aims to use regression methods to model the impact of update timing on error margins, referred to as UTEMs, for estimates at project completion. Data were collected from five residential projects of varying sizes, processed, and standardized before statistical analysis. The regression models include linear, exponential, polynomial, logarithmic, and power functions. The research results show that the exponential regression model has an excellent fit, with an R-squared value of 95.6%. The accuracy of the proposed model is high, with MPE = 3.3%, MSE = 0.3%, RMSE = 5.2%, and MAPE = 13.7%. The sensitivity analysis results indicate maximum and minimum error margins of 76.5% and 2.6% at the project's start and end, respectively. The proposed model's prediction results were verified using an actual project, demonstrating minimal deviations. The findings of this study are anticipated to add value to the broader understanding of EVM extensions and assist managers in accurately predicting project outcomes.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction management; earned value method; prediction; project tracking; regression model
Index terms: sensitivity analysis, manager, accuracy, residential project, construction project, regression model, project outcome, statistical analysis, engineer, deviation, project performance, implementation, estimate
Subjects: profession, financial and cost management, data science, professional development, project management theory and practice, statistical analysis, project completion, practitioner, contractual arrangements, economic development, production management, environmental hazards
Topics: Project Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Urban Studies, Information Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here