Zaman, A A U and Abdelaty, A (2025) Effects of uav imagery overlap on photogrammetric data quality for construction applications. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(16), pp. 1901-1916. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
UAV photogrammetry is a remote sensing method that safely collects spatial data, used in construction inspection, progress tracking, and infrastructure evaluation. This technique generates multiple output products, including point clouds and 3D textured mesh models, using structure-from-motion (SfM) algorithms on UAV-captured photos. Despite its widespread application, the required percentage of aerial imagery overlap—crucial for determining UAV flight patterns, post-processing time, and output quality—remains empirically unsupported and thus arbitrarily defined. Different SfM software can yield varying quality outputs from the same data set, emphasizing the need to evaluate these discrepancies, particularly how overlap percentages affect output quality. This study gathered UAV photogrammetric data from a construction site, created three imagery datasets with varying overlaps, and processed them with two SfM tools, Pix4Dmapper and DroneDeploy. Analysis methods included surface and volume density checks, visual inspections, and defect analysis. Findings suggest that while image overlap percentage crucially impacts output quality, significant differences between high and medium overlaps compared to low overlap were not observed. Optimal results were achieved with a manual UAV operation at 15 meters altitude, 55–60% frontal and 45% side overlaps, a ground sampling distance of 0.4–0.7 cm/pixel, and good lighting, without the need for Ground Control Points.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | aerial image overlapping percentage; construction monitoring and management; photogrammetry; point cloud and 3D mesh models; uav |
| Index terms: | point cloud, monitoring, inspection, dataset, progress tracking, post-processing, remote sensing, density, construction site, visual inspection, spatial data, sampling |
| Subjects: | project controls, work location, control systems, digital design, quality assurance, research products and data, data collection methods, data management, analytical methods, spatial and geospatial analysis, professional practice, data science |
| Topics: | Time Control, Urban Studies, Quality Management, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here