Talebi, S; Wu, S; Sen, A; Zakizadeh, N; Sun, Q and Lai, J (2025) Infrastructure automated defect detection with machine learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(16), pp. 1917-1928. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Infrastructure defects pose significant public safety risks and, if undetected, can lead to costly repairs. While machine learning (ML) technologies have significantly enhanced the capabilities for inspecting infrastructure, a comprehensive synthesis of these advancements and their practical application across various infrastructures is lacking. This study addresses this gap by providing a literature review, offering a consolidated view of current ML methodologies in Infrastructure Automated Defect Detection (IADD). This research employs a systematic literature review (SLR) approach to analyse 123 papers on ML methodologies applied to IADD. The analysis reveals the wide use of deep learning architectures like Convolutional Neural Network and its variants, which perform well in defect detection across various infrastructures, including roads, bridges, and sewers. However, standardised, comprehensive datasets are critical to train and test these models more effectively. The study also highlights the importance of developing ML approaches that can accurately assess the severity of defects, an area currently underexplored but with significant implications for risk management in infrastructure. This SLR provides a consolidated perspective on ML technologies' advancements and practical applications in IADD, and it offers substantial value to researchers, engineers, and policymakers engaged in infrastructure asset management.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | automated defect detection; classification algorithms; image processing; infrastructure; infrastructure defects; machine learning |
| Index terms: | repair, systematic literature review, engineer, image processing, sewer, literature review, machine learning, risk management, neural network, public safety, methodology, deep learning, infrastructure asset management, dataset |
| Subjects: | computer vision, infrastructure and transport systems, research evaluation and metrics, artificial intelligence, data management, risk assessment, profession, asset management, emergency and crisis management, maintenance engineering, research methods, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Digital Applications, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here