van Nguyen, M V; Khanh, K D; Thuc, T D and Nguyen, K V (2025) Appraising the influence of internal factors on organizational greenwashing through mckinsey 7s framework. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(16), pp. 2041-2050. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Greenwashing is a critical barrier to genuine environmental initiatives in the construction sector. Current studies focus on external aspects of greenwashing. However, understanding of the internal organizational factors behind greenwashing remains critically limited. This study addresses this gap by examining how internal organizational factors influence greenwashing within Vietnamese construction firms using the McKinsey 7S Framework. Research hypotheses were first developed based on the Fraud Triangle Theory. Data were then collected from 142 construction practitioners and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results revealed that organizational strategy, structure, system, shared values, style, and staff are positively associated with greenwashing practices. However, no significant relationship was found between employee skills and corporate greenwashing. These findings underscored the importance of addressing internal organizational factors to combat greenwashing. The lack of a significant relationship between employee skills and greenwashing highlighted the need for broader systemic changes rather than focusing solely on skill enhancement. Future research is encouraged to explore how external pressures interact with internal organizational factors to shape corporate greenwashing.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; greenwashing; mckinsey 7s framework; PLS-SEM; Vietnam |
| Index terms: | shared value, fraud, internal organizational factor, organizational strategy, Vietnam, construction practitioner, construction firm, structural equation modelling, construction sector, partial least square |
| Subjects: | business, equitable outcomes, professional development, sociology, statistical analysis, industry analysis, organization, Geography, professional ethics |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Information Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Value Management, Legal Issues, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here