Pham, V H S and Pham, D H (2025) A cutting-edge approach to prefabricated construction site layouts using multi-objective artificial hummingbird algorithm solution. International Journal of Construction Management, 25(16), pp. 2063-2081. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Construction site layout planning (CSLP) for prefabricated construction projects differs significantly from traditional construction projects, particularly in the use of tower cranes and the arrangement of locations for precasting components. Previous research has introduced various models to optimize CSLP problems. However, these studies often consider only one or two objective functions related to safety, transportation costs, environmental impacts, or crane performance. Additionally, many models employ long-standing metaheuristic algorithms, resulting in suboptimal solutions. This article proposes the application of the multi-objective artificial hummingbird algorithm (MOAHA) to address the CSLP by integrating objectives related to safety risks, transportation costs, and efficient tower crane operation. A case study derived from previous research, as well as a real construction site, is used to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed model. The results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms existing models in terms of objective function values and the number of optimal solutions found. Moreover, in real projects, the solutions from the model outperform the actual plan by 38–50% when comparing objective function values. This demonstrates that the model has the potential to effectively address more complex CSLP challenges in the future.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction site layout planning; hoisting time; prefabricated construction; safety risk; transportation cost |
| Index terms: | effectiveness, traditional construction, case study, tower crane, environmental impact, construction project, hoisting, construction site |
| Subjects: | environmental impact, construction operations, maintenance engineering, production management, heritage and conservation, data collection methods, work location, performance management |
| Topics: | Project Management, Sustainability, Quality Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Design Practice, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here