Innovative strategies to prevent flooding in buildings and infrastructure in Nigeria

Ilesanmi, O O; Oke, A E; Moyanga, D T; Aliu, J and Ojo, L D (2025) Innovative strategies to prevent flooding in buildings and infrastructure in Nigeria. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 16(5), pp. 688-710. ISSN 1759-5908

Abstract

Purpose – Flooding poses a critical threat to buildings and infrastructure in Nigeria, exacerbated by rapid urbanization, inadequate drainage systems and climate change. Despite the severity of this issue, existing flood prevention measures remain fragmented and ineffective. This study aims to explore innovative strategies to enhance flood resilience in buildings and infrastructure, offering sustainable, cost-effective and scalable solutions tailored to Nigeria's built environment. Design/methodology/approach – A mixed-methods approach was adopted, integrating qualitative and quantitative analyses. Subject matter experts and flood-affected residents in Lagos and Anambra were interviewed using a semi-structured approach, while construction professionals and residents were administered structured questionnaires. Statistical techniques, including the Kruskal–Wallis H-test and exploratory factor analysis, were used to identify and validate key strategies. Findings – Four strategic clusters emerged: structural adaptations; natural and green infrastructure; water management and mitigation; and planning and community strategies. These clusters provide a holistic framework for flood prevention, incorporating sustainable design, advanced construction techniques and community-driven initiatives. Practical implications – This study advocates for integrating flood-resistant materials, green infrastructure and participatory flood management into existing governance frameworks. Addressing institutional and financial constraints is crucial to scaling these interventions across Nigeria. Originality/value – This study offers actionable insights for policymakers, urban planners and construction stakeholders. It presents a localized yet adaptable approach to flood prevention, serving as a model for other developing nations facing similar challenges.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildings and infrastructure; climate resilience; flood prevention; innovative strategies; sustainable construction; urban flooding
Index terms: sustainable design, sustainable construction, exploratory factor analysis, developing nation, strategy, flooding, questionnaire, mitigation, methodology, climate change, quantitative analysis, drainage, water management, governance, climate resilience, urbanization, Nigeria, green infrastructure, adaptation, planner, built environment, Lagos, construction professional, scaling, prevention
Subjects: infrastructure and transport systems, statistical analysis, professional development, management, data analysis and analytics, sustainability and resilience, profession, data collection methods, business, environmental hazards, Geography, design process, sustainable construction, financial risk, development economics, research methods, urban planning, environmental resource management, climate science, user focus, organization
Topics: Information Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Governance, Roles and Professions, International Construction, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here