Repurposing product development after COVID-19 by integrating industry 4.0 and agile new product development practices in emerging economies

Palsodkar, M A; Pansare, R; Nagare, M R and Narwane, V (2025) Repurposing product development after COVID-19 by integrating industry 4.0 and agile new product development practices in emerging economies. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 23(5), pp. 1592-1618. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose – After the COVID-19 pandemic, companies from a variety of sectors began repurposing their product development and manufacturing activities. To be successful, repurposing requires a framework that illustrates Agile New Product Development (ANPD) and Industry 4.0 practices. The current study aims to focus on developing a framework that managers and decision-makers can use to successfully adopt ANPD-Industry 4.0 practices and decision-making activities. Design/methodology/approach – Initially, a literature review is conducted to identify practices related to ANPD and Industry 4.0. Similarly, performance metrics are identified through a review of the literature. To compute the weights of the shortlisted practices, the Pythagorean fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process is used and the Pythagorean fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution (PFCoCoSo) method is used to rank the shortlisted performance metrics. Findings – According to the findings, ANPD practices (ADP) are the most prominent among shortlisted practices. Following that are Technology Adoption Practices, Organizational Management Practices (OMP), Human Resource Management Practices and System Integration Practices. Customer requirement analysis, for example, is an ADP practice that has a significant impact on the successful repurposing of product development activities. Practical implications – The identified practices can make a significant contribution during repurposing product development activities. Practices that promote sustainable product development, as well as the use of advanced technologies, will be beneficial in improving organizational performance. Managers can evaluate performance using performance metrics that have been prioritized. Originality/value – After the COVID-19 pandemic, this could be the first of its kind to develop an RPD framework.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: agile new product development; industry 4.0; pythagorean fuzzy analytical hierarchy process; pythagorean fuzzy combined compromise solution; repurposing of product development
Index terms: performance metric, manager, COVID-19, literature review, human resource management, organizational management, system integration, methodology, decision-making, product development, pandemic, industry 4.0, emerging economy, organizational performance, new product development, analytical hierarchy process, technology adoption
Subjects: business, data analysis and analytics, technology adoption, performance measurement, health risk and incident analysis, management, decision analysis, practitioner, innovation studies, innovation and technology management, organizational theory, research methods, economic development, decision-making and optimization
Topics: Organizational Design, Digital Applications, International Construction, Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Quality Management, Risk Management, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here