Nguyen, V N; Peansupap, V and Tongthong, T (2025) Complexity measurement framework for change orders in construction projects: Case study of Vietnam. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 23(6), pp. 2082-2104. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose – This study aims to propose a complexity measurement framework for change orders in the construction phase. Design/methodology/approach – The complexity factors of change orders and evaluation criteria for complexity measurement were identified by using the Delphi method, while the weights of the complexity factors were determined by using the Analytical Hierarchy Process method. The list of factors and corresponding weights were combined to create a formula for measuring the complexity level of change orders. The framework was practically demonstrated by the change orders in the Vietnamese building construction projects as a case study. Findings – The four-stage framework was presented and practically demonstrated, including (1) identifying the complexity factors and categories of change orders; (2) determining the weights of complexity factors; (3) constructing evaluation criteria for complexity measurement of factors in change orders; and (4) measuring the complexity of change orders. Through the case study, 22 complexity factors and the evaluation criteria were identified for complexity measurement of factors in change orders during the construction phase in the Vietnamese building projects. Practical implications – The proposed framework can support project participants in comprehensively evaluating the change orders in the initial analysis, which helps them anticipate problematic issues to make appropriate plans when implementing change orders. Originality/value – This paper contributes to the literature by providing a complexity measurement framework for change orders, which researchers can adapt to measure the complexity of change orders in their specific studies with minor revisions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | change order complexity; complexity factor; complexity measurement; evaluation criteria; framework |
| Index terms: | complexity, methodology, construction project, building construction, Vietnam, construction phase, analytical hierarchy process, change order, Delphi method, case study |
| Subjects: | project delivery, data collection methods, systems engineering, contractual condition, building construction, decision-making and optimization, research methods, production management, Geography |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Research Practice, Contract Administration, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here