Machine learning applications in smart logistics: Analysing barriers for future practices

Özkan-Özen, Y D; Akcicek, C and Ozturkoglu, Y (2025) Machine learning applications in smart logistics: Analysing barriers for future practices. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 23(6), pp. 2105-2123. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose – Although there are studies analyzing barriers related to new technological concepts, it turns out that there are only a few studies on barriers to machine learning (ML) applications, and none of them consider the implications for smart logistics. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to reveal and analyze the barriers to ML applications in smart logistics from both industry and academic perspectives. Design/methodology/approach – To achieve this aim, first, various barriers to smart logistics activities based on the Industry 4.0 perspective are identified. Later, the relative importance of these barriers critical to the success of smart logistics activities is determined. Finally, the interval-valued fuzzy (IVF) DEMATEL method is used to analyze the cause-and-effect relationship between each barrier based on industry and academic perspective. Findings – Eleven barriers related to ML applications in smart logistics were evaluated by seven experts who are working in different positions. Results show that, the most crucial cause-and-effect barriers are integration and connection problems with value chain/network systems (B6), requirements of adapting new infrastructures (B11) and lack of transparency, safety and security (B3). Originality/value – There is no study about determining barriers with merging smart logistics activities with the Industry 4.0 perspective. It is expected that the results of this study will contribute to the use of ML in the logistics sector by revealing significant concepts to which businesses should pay attention to prevent these barriers and by suggesting practical solutions to these problems.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: artificial intelligence; digital technologies; fuzzy logic; industry 4.0; supply chain management
Index terms: artificial intelligence, transparency, machine learning application, fuzzy logic, industry 4.0, value chain, DEMATEL method, integration, methodology, machine learning, digital technology, relative importance
Subjects: data analysis and analytics, technology adoption, artificial intelligence, data science, risk assessment, computing systems, organizational analysis, value chain strategy, professional development, research methods
Topics: Supply Chain Management, Risk Management, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Information Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here