Moyo, T; Omer, M; Chigara, B and Edwards, D J (2025) An innovative technical support system for sustainable construction indicators in Zimbabwe. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 14(6), pp. 1879-1907. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose – Achieving sustainable construction is immensely challenging in developing economies due to their inadequate technical support system(s) (TSS). Hence, this article develops a TSS framework for sustainable construction indicators for Zimbabwe, a developing country. Design/methodology/approach – A post-positivist philosophical stance and deductive reasoning were adopted to test pertinent theory. Construction professionals in consultancy, construction companies, government bodies and academic institutions participated in an online questionnaire survey. Primary data was analysed using a reliability test, Shapiro Wilks test, Kruskal–Wallis H test, mean score ranking, normalisation value, factor analysis and fuzzy synthetic evaluation (FSE). Findings – FSE revealed a framework with six critical technical support subgroups, in order of importance viz: innovation for construction sustainability; adequate sustainability expenditure and skills training support; adequate project economic assessment and governance support; adequate circularity and environmental technical support; climate change literacy and supplier assessment support; and adequate decent work support. Existing sustainable construction initiatives can be buttressed by strengthening the six identified TSS through related policy initiatives. Originality/value – The framework developed constitutes an innovative TSS for Zimbabwe to achieve sustainable construction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | developing country; fuzzy synthetic evaluation; sustainable construction; sustainable indicator; technical support system |
| Index terms: | reasoning, questionnaire, sustainable construction, fuzzy synthetic evaluation, developing country, construction company, Zimbabwe, strengthening, subgroup, governance, construction professional, factor analysis, developing economy, consultancy, climate change, methodology, circularity, survey |
| Subjects: | structural engineering, organization, business, decision-making and optimization, economic development, sustainable materials, development economics, data collection methods, professional development, cognitive psychology, sustainable construction, climate science, research methods, Geography, statistical analysis, research management |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Engineering Principles, International Construction, Sustainability, Governance, Geographical Context, Information Management, Business Strategy, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here