Patel, T; Guo, B H W; van der Walt, J D and Zou, Y (2025) Unmanned ground vehicle (ugv) based automated construction progress measurement of road using LSTM. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(9), pp. 5764-5791. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - Current solutions for monitoring the progress of pavement construction (such as collecting, processing and analysing data) are inefficient, labour-intensive, time-consuming, tedious and error-prone. In this study, an automated solution proposes sensors prototype mounted unmanned ground vehicle (UGV) for data collection, an LSTM classifier for road layer detection, the integrated algorithm for as-built progress calculation and web-based as-built reporting. Design/methodology/approach - The crux of the proposed solution, the road layer detection model, is proposed to develop from the layer change detection model and rule-based reasoning. In the beginning, data were gathered using a UGV with a laser ToF (time-of-flight) distance sensor, accelerometer, gyroscope and GPS sensor in a controlled environment. The long short-term memory (LSTM) algorithm was utilised on acquired data to develop a classifier model for layer change detection, such as layer not changed, layer up and layer down. Findings - In controlled environment experiments, the classification of road layer changes achieved 94.35% test accuracy with 14.05% loss. Subsequently, the proposed approach, including the layer detection model, as-built measurement algorithm and reporting, was successfully implemented with a real case study to test the robustness of the model and measure the as-built progress. Research limitations/implications - The implementation of the proposed framework can allow continuous, real-time monitoring of road construction projects, eliminating the need for manual, time-consuming methods. This study will potentially help the construction industry in the real time decision-making process of construction progress monitoring and controlling action. Originality/value - This first novel approach marks the first utilization of sensors mounted UGV for monitoring road construction progress, filling a crucial research gap in incremental and segment-wise construction monitoring and offering a solution that addresses challenges faced by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and 3D reconstruction. Utilizing UGVs offers advantages like cost-effectiveness, safety and operational flexibility in no-fly zones.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | automation; construction progress monitoring; deep learning; road construction; sensor |
| Index terms: | case study, reconstruction, deep learning, pavement construction, automated construction, decision-making process, road construction, real time, monitoring, unmanned aerial vehicle, progress measurement, implementation, construction industry, automation, reasoning, cost-effectivenes, accuracy, experiment, change detection, prototype, methodology, progress monitoring |
| Subjects: | scope management, contractual arrangements, automation and robotics, infrastructure engineering, research methods, cognitive psychology, building construction, control systems, data collection methods, artificial intelligence, modelling and simulation, professional development, civil engineering, economics, industry analysis, project controls, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Project Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Site Management, Time Control, Research Practice, Information Management, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here