Dynamic incentive mechanisms in mega project-risk management considering the participation of the insurance company

Shi, Q; Yao, L; Bi, C and Zhu, J (2025) Dynamic incentive mechanisms in mega project-risk management considering the participation of the insurance company. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(9), pp. 5792-5813. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose - The construction of megaprojects often involves substantial risks. While insurance plays an important role as a traditional risk transfer means, owners and insurance companies may still suffer huge losses during the risk management process. Therefore, considering the strong motivation of insurance companies to participate in the on-site risk management of megaprojects, this study aims to propose a collaborative incentive mechanism involving insurance companies, to optimize the risk management effect and reduce the risk of accidents in megaprojects. Design/methodology/approach - Based on principal-agent theory, the research develops the static and dynamic incentive models for risk management in megaprojects, involving both the owner and insurance company. The study examines the primary factors influencing incentive efficiency. The results are numerically simulated with a validation case. Finally, the impact of parameter changes on the stakeholders' benefits is analyzed. Findings - The results indicate that the dynamic incentive model is available to the achievement of a flexible mechanism to ensure the benefits of contractors while protecting the benefits of the owner and insurance company. Adjusting the incentive coefficients for owners and insurance companies within a specified range promotes the growth of benefits for all parties involved. The management cost and economic benefit allocation coefficients have a positive effect on the adjustment range of the incentive coefficient, which helps implement a more flexible dynamic incentive mechanism to motivate contractors to carry out risk management to reduce risk losses. Originality/value - This study makes up for the absence of important stakeholders in risk management. Different from traditional megaproject risk management, this model uses insurance companies as bridges to break the island effect of risk management among multiple megaprojects. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by designing appropriate dynamic incentive mechanisms in megaproject risk management through insurance company participation, and provides practical implications to both owner and insurance company on incentive contract making, thus achieving better risk governance of megaprojects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: incentive mechanism; megaproject insurance; principal-agent theory; risk management
Index terms: incentive contract, motivation, methodology, validation, agent, body of knowledge, megaproject, efficiency, risk governance, owner, insurance, risk management
Subjects: risk assessment, performance management, professional development, sociology, practitioner, psychology, contractual arrangements, knowledge management, economic analysis, strategic project management, research methods, financial risk
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Human Resources, Risk Management, Procurement, Project Management, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here