Xie, L L; Lin, G and Luo, Y (2025) Investigating the impact of multiple governance mechanisms on new infrastructure projects performance: Evidence from China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(9), pp. 6027-6044. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose - This study aims to construct a "contractual–relational–governmental" 3D governance framework for new infrastructure projects (NIPs) within China’s distinct institutional context. The primary objective is to explore the impact of multiple governance mechanisms on the NIP performance, thus identifying the key governance mechanisms and proposing targeted performance improvement strategies. Design/methodology/approach - The research design follows a sequential mixed methodology of integrating qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis. Firstly, project governance and performance indicators were collected from relevant literature and expert interviews. Secondly, a questionnaire was developed, and data were collected through on-site and online means. Finally, the partial least square structural equation model (PLS-SEM) was utilized to examine and analyze the relationships between governance mechanisms and NIP performance. Findings- Contractual, relational and governmental governance all have a certain role in promoting the NIP performance. Specifically, contract stringency, trust and governmental decision are the core elements of contractual, relational and governmental governance, respectively, while commitment does not significantly affect NIP performance. Generally, relational and governmental governance exert a more substantial influence compared to contractual governance, with governmental decision and trust being the most effective. Originality/value - This paper contributes to the field by introducing PLS-SEM as a measurement tool for exploring the impact of multiple governance mechanisms on governance performance in NIPs. The results offer valuable insights for project managers, enabling them to concentrate on core factors while refining and optimizing governance mechanisms and strategies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contractual governance; governmental governance; new infrastructure projects; project governance; project performance; relational governance |
| Index terms: | structural equation model, project performance, performance improvement, infrastructure project, project manager, governance, research design, questionnaire, evidence, methodology, China, partial least square, performance indicator, interview, commitment, strategy |
| Subjects: | research methods, Geography, psychology, evaluation and assessment methods, infrastructure and transport systems, statistical analysis, performance measurement, management, performance management, project management theory and practice, profession, data collection methods, research design and methodology, business |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Governance, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here